开云官网

Clarifying user intent

The user's message translates to a news-like statement about controversy regarding Mbappé's injury within the French team. It seems they may want more details, a source, or a summary, but they haven't asked a specific question. I think I'll need to clarify their intent. There could also be a risk of misunderstanding since I can't browse for real-time verification. I can offer to provide a summary, context on the term "diplomatic injury," or explore past similar situations.Exploring options for user assistance

I’m thinking about how to help the user. I could ask if they'd like me to fact-check, find the original report, and provide a translation or summary. I could explain the term "外交性受伤," which generally implies a player might exaggerate an injury to avoid playing or minimize risks. However, I shouldn't make assertions about Mbappé without a reliable source. It seems prudent to check with the user first before attempting any online searches.Clarifying options for the user

The user hasn’t asked a simple question like time, so I should clarify what they want. I could provide some concise options for them:

1. Verify and locate original French sources related to Mbappé’s situation.
2. Summarize the reports and provide a timeline.
3. Give context about Mbappé’s recent injuries, such as the nasal fracture he had at Euro 2024. I should note that the phrase "外交性受伤" is often discussed in Chinese soccer fandom, and it might relate to him skipping Olympic team commitments.

There are several pieces of information I can include!Formulating a structured response

I want to be careful about not fabricating information. It’s important to use conditional language and ask the user for specifics. I could respond with something like: “Do you want me to verify and provide sources, original excerpts, and key points? Also, could you clarify the date or match in question?” I can explain that "外交性受伤" refers to a strategically reported injury. I could propose checking credible outlets like L'Equipe, RMC Sport, and others while cautioning against social media aggregators. I'll keep it concise and under guidelines!Creating a response outline

I think it’s best to start by stating that this is an unverified claim until we can see the original French report, so I might ask for a link or permission to search for it. I should also explain the term "外交性受伤" and why it’s used within the context. I should highlight what to look for in sources to determine reliability. Lastly, I can offer to fetch the information for them. Keeping it concise is key!